Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J58105:Design"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
We have used a structure for the closed rbsB (D-ribose binding protein, periplasmic) which has an x-ray structure with pdb 2DRI (271 residues). The vanilline molecule has a small structure and is not so different from the TNT and other ligands used by the designs of Hellinga.[[Image:vanilline.png|thumb|100px|Vanilline molecule.]] | We have used a structure for the closed rbsB (D-ribose binding protein, periplasmic) which has an x-ray structure with pdb 2DRI (271 residues). The vanilline molecule has a small structure and is not so different from the TNT and other ligands used by the designs of Hellinga.[[Image:vanilline.png|thumb|100px|Vanilline molecule.]] | ||
+ | We have considered the 2DRI pdb structure and we have removed all side chains corresponding to the aminoacids surrounding the original ribose. We have used a computational protein design approach [2] to search among all possible sequences the ones that stabilise (in the sense of a folding free energy) the given atomic structure. Our combinatorial search couples the side chain placement problem, with combinatorial mutagenesis and with the docking problem. Therefore, it explores the best binding mode. It also tries to find solutions with all possible ligand-protein h-bonds satisfied, which would confer a high specificity for the ligand. | ||
===Source=== | ===Source=== |
Revision as of 23:37, 29 October 2006
Synthetic periplasmic binding protein that docks a vanillin molecule
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
We have used a structure for the closed rbsB (D-ribose binding protein, periplasmic) which has an x-ray structure with pdb 2DRI (271 residues). The vanilline molecule has a small structure and is not so different from the TNT and other ligands used by the designs of Hellinga.We have considered the 2DRI pdb structure and we have removed all side chains corresponding to the aminoacids surrounding the original ribose. We have used a computational protein design approach [2] to search among all possible sequences the ones that stabilise (in the sense of a folding free energy) the given atomic structure. Our combinatorial search couples the side chain placement problem, with combinatorial mutagenesis and with the docking problem. Therefore, it explores the best binding mode. It also tries to find solutions with all possible ligand-protein h-bonds satisfied, which would confer a high specificity for the ligand.
Source
We have followed the work of Prof. Hellinga [1] but using the methodology of [2].
References
[1] L.L. Looger, M.A. Dwyer, J. Smith, H.W. Hellinga. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature, 423, 185-190 (2003).
[2] A. Jaramillo, L. Wernisch, S. Hery and S.J. Wodak. Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (2002), 13554-13559.