Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1316003"

 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1316003 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1316003 short</partinfo>
 +
<html>
  
Promoter of the yqjF gene, which is activated by the presence of several nitrogen-based compounds such as 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB. mKate2 is a far-red fluorescent protein used with reporting purposes. mKate2 codon usage is optimised for high expression in mammalian cells (humanised). It is, nevertheless, suitable for propagation in E. coli.
+
<p>
This construct is, then, designed to be able to detect and quantify the presence of compunds such as 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB.
+
Promoter of the <i>yqjF</i> gene, which is activated by the presence of several nitrogen-based compounds such as 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB. mKate2 is a far-red fluorescent protein used with reporting purposes. mKate2 codon usage is optimised for high expression in mammalian cells (humanised). It is, nevertheless, suitable for propagation in <i>E. coli</i>.
 +
This construct is, then, designed to be able to detect and quantify the presence of compunds such as 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB.[1]
  
 
<h3>Characterisation</h3>
 
<h3>Characterisation</h3>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Different concentrations of 2,4-DNT were used to test for induction of mKate2. The samples were analysed on the plate reader searching for fluorescence (Excitation wavelength: 588nm, Emission wavelength: 633nm). The BioBrick BBa_K1316003 (sample B on the Figures) showed an increasing fluorescent signal over time when induced with DNT. When non-induced (0mg/L DNT), the constructs showed no clear increase in fluorescent signal. The BioBrick BBa_K1316003 showed a much higher response than BBa_K1316005 (sample C on the Figures), hence, the yqjF promoter responds better to DNT than the ybiJ promoter, consistently with the literature (Belkin et al., 2014). At the same time, BBa_K1316003 is more sensitive to 2,4-DNT than BBa_K1316005 showing the first one a lower threshold for 2,4-DNT than the second one.
+
Different type of experiments were conducted to characterize the Landmine Detection BioBricks.
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<p>
 +
The different constructs used are:
 +
<ul>
 +
<li> p[F]::mKATE, also referred here as LD2, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316003 </li>
 +
<li> p[J]::mKATE, also referred here as LD3, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316005 </li>
 +
<li> p[F] incl. N-enzymes, also referred here  as LD4, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316007  </li>
 +
<li> p[J] incl. N-enzymes, also referred here as LD5, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316008  </li>
 +
<li> p[F]::mKATE p[J]::mKATE, also referred here  as LD6, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316009  </li>
 +
</ul>
  
The non-induction of the negative control (sample D on the Figures) indicates that it is the presence of the promoter what generates the signal in front of the presence of DNT. Sample A is the positive control constitutively expressing mKate2.
 
 
</p>
 
</p>
 +
<br>
  
 +
<h4> Plate Reader </h4>
 
<p>
 
<p>
For more information about the characterisation of this construct visit the Landmine Detection module characterisation on our wiki page! (http://2014.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft-Leiden/WetLab/landmine/characterisation)
+
A plate reader is a machine designed to handle samples on 6-1536 well format microtiter plates for the measuring of physical properties such as absorbance, fluorescence intensity, luminescence, time-resolved fluorescence, and fluorescence polarisation. Concerning this module, the plate reader device was used for the measurement of fluorescence intensity generated by cells carrying the BioBricks designed to detect land mines. The final protocol developed for Plate reader analysis for this module can be found by clicking on<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f4/Delft2014_PlatereaderLD.pdf"> this link</a>.</p>
  
 +
</b>
 +
<br>
 +
<h4> Results - Plate Reader </h4>
 +
<p>
 +
Using the different final Landmine detection constructs LD2-6, different concentrations of 2,4-DNT were tested (figure 1). 2,4-DNT, due to safety reasons, was bought in liquid solution dissolved in acetonitrile. To test that the compound triggering the response of the promoters is 2,4-DNT and not acetonitrile, the 0 mg/L 2,4-DNT solution was prepared with the same concentration of acetonitrile contained in the most concentrated 2,4-DNT solution.
 
</p>
 
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<p>The fact that the positive control (constitutively expressed mKate2) presents a clear fluorescence signal at 0 and 50 mg/L, but not at 100 mg/L indicates that high concentrations of 2,4-DNT are toxic for cells after several hours. The toxic compound seems to be 2,4-DNT and not acetonitrile because the sample at 0 mg/L 2,4-DNT (same acetonitrile concentration as the 100 mg/L 2,4-DNT sample) did not kill the cells. Constructs LD2, LD3 and LD6 as well as LD4 and LD5 with no induction of the N-genes show no clear mKate2 induction over time. Not many conclusions can be drawn form LD2 due to the big standard deviation. However, when the N-genes are induced with L-Rhamnose, the constructs LD4 and LD5 showed a clear increase in fluorescence over time for a concentration of 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT. In this situation, besides, LD5 seems to be more sensitive, as there is less leakage (there is less fluorescence signal at 0 mg/L DNT).
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 +
It could still be that at 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT, what triggers the response of the promoters is actually the acetonitrile and not the 2,4-DNT, but that would be strange because at 0 mg/L 2,4-DNT (acetonitrile is 2 times more concentrated than at 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT) the cells survive and there is no fluorescence response.
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
  
Samples:
+
<p>
A - Positive control (Constitutive mKate2)
+
This data suggests that both promoters, ybiJ and yqjF, respond to 2,4-DNT; and that the presence of the N-genes is of high importance for this response. Hence, we conclude that the two best BioBricks for Landmine detection are (in this order) LD5 (p[J] incl. N-enzymes) and LD4 (p[F] incl. N-enzymes), and in order to obtain a good result the N-genes must be expressed.
B - BBa_K1316003
+
C - BBa_K1316005
+
D - Negative control (cells without the construct)
+
  
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d7/TUDelft_2014_DNT_50_Water.png
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/02/TUDelft_2014_DNT_17_Water.png
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a8/TUDelft_2014_DNT_0_Water.png
 
  
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bf/TUDelft_2014_Fluorescence_LD_final.png" width="100%" height="100%">
 +
<p>
 +
<figcaption>
 +
Figure 1: Fluorescence signal measured on the plate reader. Positive control: constitutively expressed mKate2. Negative control: Empty cells carrying no BioBrick
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
  
  
</p>
 
  
 +
<a name="LDfacs"></a>
 +
<h4> FACS </h4>
 
<p>
 
<p>
 +
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is a specialised type of flow cytometry that allows the separation of individual cells based on the specific light scattering and fluorescent characteristics of each cell. Using FACS, information can be attained of the size, shape and fluorescence of individual cells, therefore, it is a technique that can be used to observe the fluorescent response of our Landminde detection BioBricks in front of DNT.
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>The FACS technology was used to test the LD2 (p[F]::mKATE) construct. Cultures of this construct were induced with 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT. Aliquots of the culture were taken after 2 and 6 hours; centrifuged and resuspended in PBS solution to eliminate the 2,4-DNT and the acetonitrile; and were then analysed at the FACS machine. At the same time, a strain constitutively expressing mKate2 and an empty strain were used as positive and negative controls respectively. Two cultures of LD2 were used (samples 1 and 2 in figure 2) in order to get the LD2 data in duplo.
 +
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<p> The results of the FACS experiments show that the fluorescent response increases with time after induction and, therefore, it means that the yqjF promoter was activated. Figure 2 contains all the LD2 culture (2 and 6 hours after induction), as well as the positive and negative controls. Figure 3 only contains the LD2 culture (2 and 6 hours after induction) and, hence, it provides a more clear picture of the promoter induction. Unfortunately, no solution was prepared containing acetonitrile and water alone and, therefore, we cannot conclude that the induction was caused by 2,4-DNT as it could have been caused by acetonitrile. Nevertheless, as aforementioned, the plate reader results suggests that 2,4-DNT is more likely to be the inducer of the promoters rather than acetonitrile. 
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<h4> Results - FACS </h4>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/98/TUDelft_2014_Few_induction.jpg" width="75%" height="75%">
 +
<figcaption>
 +
Figure 2: Fluorescence signal emitted by cells carrying constitutively expressed mKate2 (positive control), two parallel samples of the construct LD2 (p[F]::mKATE) (Samples 1 and 2), and empty cells not carrying any BioBrick (negative control) 2 hours after induction (left) and 6 hours after induction (right).
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/34/ITUDelft_2014_GEM2014_Page_07.jpg" width="75%" height="75%">
 +
<figcaption>
 +
Figure 3: Fluorescence signal emitted by cells carrying the construct LD2 (p[F]::mKATE) of two different cultures (Top and Bottom) 2 hours after DNT induction (samples 1 and 2) and 6 hours after DNT induction (samples 1 after and 2 after).
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
 +
 +
 +
For more information about the characterisation of this construct visit the <a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft-Leiden/WetLab/landmine/characterisation"> <b> Landmine Detection module characterisation  </b> </a> on our wiki page!
 +
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<h3> References </h3>
 +
<p>[1] S. Yagur-Kroll, S. Belkin <i>et al.</i>, “<i>Escherichia Coli</i> bioreporters for the detection of 2,4-dinitrotoluene and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene”, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 885-895, 2014. </p>
 +
</html>
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Latest revision as of 21:36, 17 October 2014

yqjF promoter coupled to mKate2 reporter gene

Promoter of the yqjF gene, which is activated by the presence of several nitrogen-based compounds such as 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB. mKate2 is a far-red fluorescent protein used with reporting purposes. mKate2 codon usage is optimised for high expression in mammalian cells (humanised). It is, nevertheless, suitable for propagation in E. coli. This construct is, then, designed to be able to detect and quantify the presence of compunds such as 2,4,6-TNT, 2,4-DNT and 1,3-DNB.[1]

Characterisation

Different type of experiments were conducted to characterize the Landmine Detection BioBricks.


The different constructs used are:

  • p[F]::mKATE, also referred here as LD2, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316003
  • p[J]::mKATE, also referred here as LD3, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316005
  • p[F] incl. N-enzymes, also referred here as LD4, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316007
  • p[J] incl. N-enzymes, also referred here as LD5, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316008
  • p[F]::mKATE p[J]::mKATE, also referred here as LD6, which corresponds to BioBrick BBa_K1316009


Plate Reader

A plate reader is a machine designed to handle samples on 6-1536 well format microtiter plates for the measuring of physical properties such as absorbance, fluorescence intensity, luminescence, time-resolved fluorescence, and fluorescence polarisation. Concerning this module, the plate reader device was used for the measurement of fluorescence intensity generated by cells carrying the BioBricks designed to detect land mines. The final protocol developed for Plate reader analysis for this module can be found by clicking on this link.


Results - Plate Reader

Using the different final Landmine detection constructs LD2-6, different concentrations of 2,4-DNT were tested (figure 1). 2,4-DNT, due to safety reasons, was bought in liquid solution dissolved in acetonitrile. To test that the compound triggering the response of the promoters is 2,4-DNT and not acetonitrile, the 0 mg/L 2,4-DNT solution was prepared with the same concentration of acetonitrile contained in the most concentrated 2,4-DNT solution.


The fact that the positive control (constitutively expressed mKate2) presents a clear fluorescence signal at 0 and 50 mg/L, but not at 100 mg/L indicates that high concentrations of 2,4-DNT are toxic for cells after several hours. The toxic compound seems to be 2,4-DNT and not acetonitrile because the sample at 0 mg/L 2,4-DNT (same acetonitrile concentration as the 100 mg/L 2,4-DNT sample) did not kill the cells. Constructs LD2, LD3 and LD6 as well as LD4 and LD5 with no induction of the N-genes show no clear mKate2 induction over time. Not many conclusions can be drawn form LD2 due to the big standard deviation. However, when the N-genes are induced with L-Rhamnose, the constructs LD4 and LD5 showed a clear increase in fluorescence over time for a concentration of 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT. In this situation, besides, LD5 seems to be more sensitive, as there is less leakage (there is less fluorescence signal at 0 mg/L DNT).


It could still be that at 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT, what triggers the response of the promoters is actually the acetonitrile and not the 2,4-DNT, but that would be strange because at 0 mg/L 2,4-DNT (acetonitrile is 2 times more concentrated than at 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT) the cells survive and there is no fluorescence response.


This data suggests that both promoters, ybiJ and yqjF, respond to 2,4-DNT; and that the presence of the N-genes is of high importance for this response. Hence, we conclude that the two best BioBricks for Landmine detection are (in this order) LD5 (p[J] incl. N-enzymes) and LD4 (p[F] incl. N-enzymes), and in order to obtain a good result the N-genes must be expressed.

Figure 1: Fluorescence signal measured on the plate reader. Positive control: constitutively expressed mKate2. Negative control: Empty cells carrying no BioBrick

FACS

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is a specialised type of flow cytometry that allows the separation of individual cells based on the specific light scattering and fluorescent characteristics of each cell. Using FACS, information can be attained of the size, shape and fluorescence of individual cells, therefore, it is a technique that can be used to observe the fluorescent response of our Landminde detection BioBricks in front of DNT.


The FACS technology was used to test the LD2 (p[F]::mKATE) construct. Cultures of this construct were induced with 50 mg/L 2,4-DNT. Aliquots of the culture were taken after 2 and 6 hours; centrifuged and resuspended in PBS solution to eliminate the 2,4-DNT and the acetonitrile; and were then analysed at the FACS machine. At the same time, a strain constitutively expressing mKate2 and an empty strain were used as positive and negative controls respectively. Two cultures of LD2 were used (samples 1 and 2 in figure 2) in order to get the LD2 data in duplo.


The results of the FACS experiments show that the fluorescent response increases with time after induction and, therefore, it means that the yqjF promoter was activated. Figure 2 contains all the LD2 culture (2 and 6 hours after induction), as well as the positive and negative controls. Figure 3 only contains the LD2 culture (2 and 6 hours after induction) and, hence, it provides a more clear picture of the promoter induction. Unfortunately, no solution was prepared containing acetonitrile and water alone and, therefore, we cannot conclude that the induction was caused by 2,4-DNT as it could have been caused by acetonitrile. Nevertheless, as aforementioned, the plate reader results suggests that 2,4-DNT is more likely to be the inducer of the promoters rather than acetonitrile.


Results - FACS

Figure 2: Fluorescence signal emitted by cells carrying constitutively expressed mKate2 (positive control), two parallel samples of the construct LD2 (p[F]::mKATE) (Samples 1 and 2), and empty cells not carrying any BioBrick (negative control) 2 hours after induction (left) and 6 hours after induction (right).
Figure 3: Fluorescence signal emitted by cells carrying the construct LD2 (p[F]::mKATE) of two different cultures (Top and Bottom) 2 hours after DNT induction (samples 1 and 2) and 6 hours after DNT induction (samples 1 after and 2 after).
For more information about the characterisation of this construct visit the Landmine Detection module characterisation on our wiki page!



References

[1] S. Yagur-Kroll, S. Belkin et al., “Escherichia Coli bioreporters for the detection of 2,4-dinitrotoluene and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene”, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 885-895, 2014.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 128
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 733
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 922