Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1554002:Design"
(→References) |
(→Design Notes) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
− | <partinfo> | + | <partinfo>BBa_K1554002 short</partinfo> |
− | <partinfo> | + | <partinfo>BBa_K1554002 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> |
===Design Notes=== | ===Design Notes=== | ||
− | Codon optimization for ''Nicotiana benthamiana'' was performed before ordering sequence by gBlock. | + | Codon optimization for ''Nicotiana benthamiana'' was performed before ordering sequence by gBlock. An ER retention signal (KKYR) was attached to the C-terminal end as it was shown to have better performance (Ding 2014). Original sequence accession number: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF709978 JF709978]. |
+ | |||
+ | It was designed for GoldenBraid 2.0, a Golden Gate-based assembly system, so it has the overhangs required (AATG and GCTT). This part was sent to the Registry of Parts using [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1467200 RFP coding device - Golden Gate Module Flipper]. | ||
===Source=== | ===Source=== | ||
− | Ordered by gBlock | + | Ordered by gBlock. |
===References=== | ===References=== |
Latest revision as of 21:31, 16 October 2014
HarFAR
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 1104
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI site found at 929
Design Notes
Codon optimization for Nicotiana benthamiana was performed before ordering sequence by gBlock. An ER retention signal (KKYR) was attached to the C-terminal end as it was shown to have better performance (Ding 2014). Original sequence accession number: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JF709978 JF709978].
It was designed for GoldenBraid 2.0, a Golden Gate-based assembly system, so it has the overhangs required (AATG and GCTT). This part was sent to the Registry of Parts using RFP coding device - Golden Gate Module Flipper.
Source
Ordered by gBlock.
References
[1] Choi MY, Han KS, Boo KS, Jurenka RA (2002) Pheromone biosynthetic pathways in the moths Helicoverpa zea and Helicoverpa assulta. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 32, 1353-9.
[2] Wang HL, Zhao CH, Wang CZ (2005) Comparative study of sex pheromone composition and biosynthesis in Helicoverpa armigera, H. assulta and their hybrid. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 35, 575-83.
[3] Fu X, Fukuzawa M, Tabata J, Tatsuki S, Ishikawa Y (2005) Sex pheromone biosynthesis in Ostrinia zaguliaevi, a congener of the European corn borer moth O. nubilalis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 35, 621-6.
[4] Matsumoto S (2010) Molecular mechanisms underlying sex pheromone production in moths. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 74, 223-31.
[5] Gu SH, Wu KM, Guo YY, Pickett JA, Field LM, Zhou JJ et al (2013) Identification of genes expressed in the sex pheromone gland of the black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon with putative roles in sex pheromone biosynthesis and transport. BMC Genomics. 14, 636.
[6] Hagström Å, Wang HL, Liénard MA, Lassance JM, Johansson T, Löfstedt C (2013) A moth pheromone brewery: production of (Z)-11-hexadecenol by heterologous co-expression of two biosynthetic genes from a noctuid moth in a yeast cell factory. Microb Cell Fact. 12, 125.
[7] Ding BJ, Hofvander P, Wang HL, Durrett TP, Stymne S, Löfstedt C (2014) A plant factory for moth pheromone production. Nat Commun. 5, 3353.
[8] Hagström AK, Liénard MA, Groot AT, Hedenström E, Löfstedt C Semi-selective fatty acyl reductases from four heliothine moths influence the specific pheromone composition. PLoS One. 7, e37230.