Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa R0082:Experience"
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
In the system, OmpR-controlled promoter (PompC) is involved in. The expression strength of PompC is depending upon the medium osmolarity. When medium osmolarity is increasing, the EnvZ will phosphorylate more OmpR into phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P), and more OmpR-P will result in stronger expression strength of PompC. In our circuitry design, ''CheZ'' is upstream regulated by PompC. As the osmotic pressure is increasing, the motile ability of the engineered E.coli keeps growing, resulting in it's suicide. | In the system, OmpR-controlled promoter (PompC) is involved in. The expression strength of PompC is depending upon the medium osmolarity. When medium osmolarity is increasing, the EnvZ will phosphorylate more OmpR into phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P), and more OmpR-P will result in stronger expression strength of PompC. In our circuitry design, ''CheZ'' is upstream regulated by PompC. As the osmotic pressure is increasing, the motile ability of the engineered E.coli keeps growing, resulting in it's suicide. | ||
− | We use semi-solid medium culture with gradient concentration of sucrose to characterize the device (BBa_K1412010). Setting the motile ability is proportional to the moving radius. From the plot, when no sucrose added in, the motile ability is the weakest. The motile ability keeps growing while the concentration of sucrose increased from 0 to 4%. Then the motile ability went down slightly as the sucrose concentration increased from 4% to 10%, but is still stronger than that at concentration 0. We can make the conclusion that our device is working as expectation, the motile ability went down because of the inhibition from hyperosmotic pressure. Besides, for even at the inhibiting osmotic pressure, the motile ability is still stronger than that without any inducer, reprogrammed CL-1 may even swim to killing osmotic pressure which will kill bacteria itself. | + | We use semi-solid medium culture with gradient concentration of sucrose to characterize the device ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1412010 BBa_K1412010]). Setting the motile ability is proportional to the moving radius. From the plot, when no sucrose added in, the motile ability is the weakest. The motile ability keeps growing while the concentration of sucrose increased from 0 to 4%. Then the motile ability went down slightly as the sucrose concentration increased from 4% to 10%, but is still stronger than that at concentration 0. We can make the conclusion that our device is working as expectation, the motile ability went down because of the inhibition from hyperosmotic pressure. Besides, for even at the inhibiting osmotic pressure, the motile ability is still stronger than that without any inducer, reprogrammed CL-1 may even swim to killing osmotic pressure which will kill bacteria itself. |
|} | |} | ||
<!-- End of the user review template --> | <!-- End of the user review template --> | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1412010 EndReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K1412010 EndReviews</partinfo> |
Revision as of 10:48, 15 October 2014
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_R0082
User Reviews
UNIQb00f042647e3ba36-partinfo-00000000-QINU
No review score entered. Edinburgh iGEM 2009 |
|
UNIQb00f042647e3ba36-partinfo-00000002-QINU
UNIQb00f042647e3ba36-partinfo-00000003-QINU
- Characterization of new series of OmpC propmoters
Tokyo Tech iGEM2010 |
In order to characterize PompC(C) BBa_395301, PompC(CB) BBa395302 and PompC(CS1) BBa_395303, each promoter was attached to GFP and its transcriptional activity was measured through the GFP expression. [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Project/wolf_coli/New_Series_of_PompC ...see more about PompC series] |
UNIQb00f042647e3ba36-partinfo-00000004-QINU
Characterization of OmpC promoter by chemotaxis
UNIQb00f042647e3ba36-partinfo-00000005-QINU
XMU-China iGEM 2014 |
The plot of Moving radius versus Sucrose concentration. The four curves were measured after 10h, 11h, 12h and 16.5h respectively.
We use semi-solid medium culture with gradient concentration of sucrose to characterize the device (BBa_K1412010). Setting the motile ability is proportional to the moving radius. From the plot, when no sucrose added in, the motile ability is the weakest. The motile ability keeps growing while the concentration of sucrose increased from 0 to 4%. Then the motile ability went down slightly as the sucrose concentration increased from 4% to 10%, but is still stronger than that at concentration 0. We can make the conclusion that our device is working as expectation, the motile ability went down because of the inhibition from hyperosmotic pressure. Besides, for even at the inhibiting osmotic pressure, the motile ability is still stronger than that without any inducer, reprogrammed CL-1 may even swim to killing osmotic pressure which will kill bacteria itself. |
UNIQb00f042647e3ba36-partinfo-00000006-QINU