Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1429002"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
IP free cyan fluorescent protein. We have a ribosome binding site (RBS). | IP free cyan fluorescent protein. We have a ribosome binding site (RBS). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Background | ||
+ | |||
+ | Making sure the inserts are here from the colony PCR results - are the GFP and RFP inserts present? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Digest each plasmid with EcoRI/PstI. Incubate 15' at 37C. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Run entire digest on 0.8% gel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Results | ||
+ | |||
+ | These were slightly confounding. What I *think* happened is that the buffer wasn't optimal for one of the enzymes, so the digest wasn't run to completion. Why do I think this? | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Revision as of 01:13, 1 October 2014
Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) "Cindy Lou" coding region, intellectual property-free
IP free cyan fluorescent protein. We have a ribosome binding site (RBS).
Background
Making sure the inserts are here from the colony PCR results - are the GFP and RFP inserts present?
Digest each plasmid with EcoRI/PstI. Incubate 15' at 37C.
Run entire digest on 0.8% gel.
Results
These were slightly confounding. What I *think* happened is that the buffer wasn't optimal for one of the enzymes, so the digest wasn't run to completion. Why do I think this?
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 74
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 2