Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1045010:Experience"
(→Applications of BBa_K1045010) |
(→Applications of BBa_K1045010) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Applications of BBa_K1045010=== | ===Applications of BBa_K1045010=== | ||
− | We used this part in our DarR reporter system [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]]. '''BBa_K1045010''' seemed to have been functional as our characterization experiments of [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] suggested. In this system, ''gfp'' is placed under the control of the DarR operator [[Part:BBa_K1045000|BBa_K1045000]]. We saw that GFP expression was repressed when ''E. coli'' harbored a construct carrying a DarR expression unit with '''BBa_K1045010''' as an RBS. | + | We used this part in our DarR reporter system [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]]. '''BBa_K1045010''' seemed to have been functional as our characterization experiments of [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] suggested. In this system, ''gfp'' is placed under the control of the DarR operator [[Part:BBa_K1045000|BBa_K1045000]]. We saw that GFP expression was repressed when ''E. coli'' harbored a construct carrying a DarR expression unit with '''BBa_K1045010''' as an RBS. |
+ | |||
+ | == Microscope data == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The experimental setup used for characterization of the DarR reporter system [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] involved two different ''E. coli'' strains: ''E. coli'' was transformed either with [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] or [[Part:BBa_K1045013|BBa_K1045013]] as a control. Both strains were grown in the abscence of c-di-AMP and subjected to fluorescence microscopy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In [[Part:BBa_K1045013|BBa_K1045013]], ''gfp'' is placed downstream of a strong promoter and the DarR operator. This vector does not encode for DarR. The strong fluorescence of the cells transformed with [[Part:BBa_K1045013|BBa_K1045013]] ('''Fig. 1''' ''top'') indicated that GFP was expressed. However, when transformed with [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] ('''Fig. 1''' ''bottom''), the cells showed almost no fluorescence. In contrast to [[Part:BBa_K1045013|BBa_K1045013]], [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]] encodes for DarR. The low fluorescence suggested that DarR was expressed and active as a repressor down-regulating ''gfp'' transcription. Hence, DarR seems to act as a strong repressor in ''E. coli'' even in the absence of cyclic di-AMP. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:-DarR.jpg|420px|thumb|'''Fig. 1.''': ''Top'': ''E. coli'' transformed with a plasmid encoding [[Part:BBa_K1045013|BBa_K1045013]] shows a strong green fluorescence under the fluorescence microscope. ''Bottom'': ''E. coli'' transformed with a plasmid harboring the DarR reporter system barely shows fluorescence. [[File:+DarR.jpg|420px]]|center]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Plate reader data == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We furthermore produced quantitative data characterizing the growth and the fluorescence over time of the BL21 ''E. coli''s we transformed with the DarR reporter system construct [[Part:BBa_K1045017|BBa_K1045017]]. As a control, we used ''E. coli'' cells harboring the [[Part:BBa_K1045013|BBa_K1045013]] plasmid. | ||
+ | The following graphs show the results of the plate reader experiments performed to quantify the strength of the DarR construct in ''E. coli''. Shown are growth curves measured at the wavelength 600 nm for the cell density ('''Fig. 2''') and 509 nm for the GFP ('''Fig. 3'''), which is encoded in the construct. For each measurement, three technical and two biological replicates were done. The graphs show the mean value of the technical replicates and one of the biological replicates. As written in the legend, a dilution series of c-di-AMP was used to test the reaction of the DarR reporter system to the nucleotide. Experimental setup: total time 21 h; 15 min measurement interval; 37°C, medium shaking; 96-well titer plate; Synergy Mx Monochromator-Based Multi-Mode Microplate Reader; Gen5 V2.01 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:DarR_Growth_cdiAMP.png|400px|thumb|'''Fig. 2''': ''Top'': Growth curve of the cells with the DarR construct; ''Bottom'': Growth curve of the GFP Control (Cells transformed with the reporter system, but without the repressor DarR).Please enlarge the pictures for better reading. (click on them)[[File:GFP_Control_Growth_cdiAMP.png|400px|]]|left]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:DarR_Fluorescence_cdiAMP.png|400px|thumb|'''Fig. 2''': ''Top'': Fluorescence curve of the cells with the riboswitch construct; ''Bottom'': Fluorescence curve of the GFP Control. Please enlarge the pictures for better reading (click on them).[[File:GFP_Control_Fluorescence_cdiAMP.png|400px|]]|right]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br style="clear:both;"/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | As in the microscope experiments described above, DarR prevented expression of the reporter, even without c-di-AMP. It was observed that the presence of c-di-AMP, regardless of the concentration used, had no effect on the ''gfp'' expression. This data indicated a high-affinity binding of DarR to its operator in ''E. coli'' in the abscence of c-di-AMP. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In conclusion, the experiments showed that the cells can grow with the construct, and that DarR is highly active as a repressor. In the future, mutagenesis of the operator sequence or the binding motive in the protein might lower the strength of the repressor. This could make it possible to control DarR binding to the operator via different c-di-AMP concentrations. '''In contrast, regarding the current binding strenght of DarR [[Part:BBa_K1045001|BBa_K1045001]] to the operator [[Part:BBa_K1045000|BBa_K1045000]], these two biobricks could serve as an "inverter". Controlled by an inducable promoter, DarR would stop the transcription of a gene connected to the DarR operator sequence only upon induction of DarR expression.''' | ||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== |
Revision as of 14:09, 16 October 2013
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K1045010
We used this part in our DarR reporter system BBa_K1045017. BBa_K1045010 seemed to have been functional as our characterization experiments of BBa_K1045017 suggested. In this system, gfp is placed under the control of the DarR operator BBa_K1045000. We saw that GFP expression was repressed when E. coli harbored a construct carrying a DarR expression unit with BBa_K1045010 as an RBS.
Microscope data
The experimental setup used for characterization of the DarR reporter system BBa_K1045017 involved two different E. coli strains: E. coli was transformed either with BBa_K1045017 or BBa_K1045013 as a control. Both strains were grown in the abscence of c-di-AMP and subjected to fluorescence microscopy.
In BBa_K1045013, gfp is placed downstream of a strong promoter and the DarR operator. This vector does not encode for DarR. The strong fluorescence of the cells transformed with BBa_K1045013 (Fig. 1 top) indicated that GFP was expressed. However, when transformed with BBa_K1045017 (Fig. 1 bottom), the cells showed almost no fluorescence. In contrast to BBa_K1045013, BBa_K1045017 encodes for DarR. The low fluorescence suggested that DarR was expressed and active as a repressor down-regulating gfp transcription. Hence, DarR seems to act as a strong repressor in E. coli even in the absence of cyclic di-AMP.
Plate reader data
We furthermore produced quantitative data characterizing the growth and the fluorescence over time of the BL21 E. colis we transformed with the DarR reporter system construct BBa_K1045017. As a control, we used E. coli cells harboring the BBa_K1045013 plasmid. The following graphs show the results of the plate reader experiments performed to quantify the strength of the DarR construct in E. coli. Shown are growth curves measured at the wavelength 600 nm for the cell density (Fig. 2) and 509 nm for the GFP (Fig. 3), which is encoded in the construct. For each measurement, three technical and two biological replicates were done. The graphs show the mean value of the technical replicates and one of the biological replicates. As written in the legend, a dilution series of c-di-AMP was used to test the reaction of the DarR reporter system to the nucleotide. Experimental setup: total time 21 h; 15 min measurement interval; 37°C, medium shaking; 96-well titer plate; Synergy Mx Monochromator-Based Multi-Mode Microplate Reader; Gen5 V2.01
As in the microscope experiments described above, DarR prevented expression of the reporter, even without c-di-AMP. It was observed that the presence of c-di-AMP, regardless of the concentration used, had no effect on the gfp expression. This data indicated a high-affinity binding of DarR to its operator in E. coli in the abscence of c-di-AMP.
In conclusion, the experiments showed that the cells can grow with the construct, and that DarR is highly active as a repressor. In the future, mutagenesis of the operator sequence or the binding motive in the protein might lower the strength of the repressor. This could make it possible to control DarR binding to the operator via different c-di-AMP concentrations. In contrast, regarding the current binding strenght of DarR BBa_K1045001 to the operator BBa_K1045000, these two biobricks could serve as an "inverter". Controlled by an inducable promoter, DarR would stop the transcription of a gene connected to the DarR operator sequence only upon induction of DarR expression.
User Reviews
UNIQ439dfeced3a12b5f-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ439dfeced3a12b5f-partinfo-00000001-QINU