Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1149051"

Line 24: Line 24:
 
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
 
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
 
|[[File:743px-3HB_assay_from_PHB_másolata.jpg|thumbnail|left|600px| <b>The chemical analysis of the produced bioplastic. The samples break break down to 3HB monomers after treatment with our PhaZ1 enzyme (BBa_K1149010). We synthesised P(3HB) using our improved Biobrick part (hybrid promoter phaCAB, BBa_K1149051). Our engineered bioplastic producing E. coli synthesised P(3HB) directly from waste. Imperial iGEM data</b>]]
 
|[[File:743px-3HB_assay_from_PHB_másolata.jpg|thumbnail|left|600px| <b>The chemical analysis of the produced bioplastic. The samples break break down to 3HB monomers after treatment with our PhaZ1 enzyme (BBa_K1149010). We synthesised P(3HB) using our improved Biobrick part (hybrid promoter phaCAB, BBa_K1149051). Our engineered bioplastic producing E. coli synthesised P(3HB) directly from waste. Imperial iGEM data</b>]]
 +
|}
 +
 +
 +
<h2>Production of P(3HB): Microscopy</h2>
 +
 +
<p align="justify">Streaking the bacteria on Nile Red plates cannot be used to accurately decide the difference between P3HB production due to the effect differing thicknesses of cell layers will have on fluorescence intensity. We imaged the cells using the fluorescent microscope to qualitatively understand how much P3HB is produced per cell. As indicated by other authors, we saw that P3HB is found in localised granules within the bacteria. Empty vector containing cells show little fluorescence. In those that do, the staining is qualitatively different than in the phaCAB containing strains. Nile Red is also used as a lipid stain and this is indicated by its staining of the membranes of EV cells. In contrast, in phaCAB containing cells, staining is restricted to points within the cells.</p>
 +
    <p align="justify">Each fluorescent image was created by exciting the stain at 530nm for 100ms. Despite this standard treatment of samples the intensity of fluorescence produced by the cells containing the hybrid promoter is greater than from the constitutive ones. This could indicate a difference in the strength of the promoters which lead to phaCAB expression and therefore the amount of P3HB produced. The images also suggest that not every single E.coli is stained. This may be due to the conditions in which the cells were grown or may be dependent upon the stage in the lifecycle of the E.coli.</p>
 +
   
 +
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;"
 +
|[[File:800px-Flourescent_Microscopy_Comparison.PNG|thumbnail|left|900px| <b>Fluorescent microscope images of E.coli stained with Nile Red. 1 -Empty vector, 2 - constitutive promoter phaCAB, 3 - hybrid promoter phaCAB. Images labelled a are fluorescent images excited at 530nm ovelaid on the bright field images shown in the b set of images. Images by Imperial College iGEM Team</b>]]
 
|}
 
|}
  

Revision as of 18:23, 2 October 2013

Hybrid promoter phaCAB

Introduction: optimised bioplastic producing operon

In R. eutropha cells, P(3HB) is made through 3 steps. Two acetyl-CoA molecules made from carbohydrate converted to acetoacetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase encoded by PhaA gene. Then acetoacetyl-CoA reductase encoded by PhaB gene catalyzes the reduction of acetoacetyl-CoA to (R)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA (3HB-CoA). Finally, P(3HB) synthase encoded by PhaC gene catalyzes polymerization reaction of monomer molecules to polymer P(3HB) [2].

We cloned the constitutive promoter J23104+ RBS B0034 upstream of the native phaCAB promoter and the phaCAB operon. Thus this part consists of a hybrid promoter system, which functions as an optimised bioplastic producing operon.

Increased production of P(3HB)

The Imperial College iGEM team have successfully purified P(3HB) from E. coli. (MG1655) transformed with either native phaCAB (BBa_K934001 or hybrid promoter phaCAB (BBa_K1149051). Our novel Biobrick hybrid promoter phaCAB (BBa_K1149051) produces significantly more P(3HB) than the native phaCAB operon. To find more information about the reasons for improvement, the design and methods of changing the promoter on Imperial iGEM wiki: [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/BioPlastic_Recycling:_PHB PHB recycling.]

A summary of the improved production of P3HB by our hybrid promoter-phaCAB construct(BBa_K1149051) over the native promoter-phaCAB. Imperial iGEM data
Comparison of P3HB production P3HB extracted from E.coli MG1655 transformed with left to right, control (empty vector), native phaCAB (BBa_K934001) and hybrid promoter phaCAB (BBa_K1149051). Each produced in 300ml cultures of LB with 3% glucose after one night growing at 37 degrees celsius. Imperial iGEM data


Comparison of P3HB production <b>(left) 1.5ml tube, natural phaCAB (BBa_K934001) (right) 5ml tube, phaCAB expressed from the hybrid promoter, (BBa_K1149051). Imperial iGEM data


3HB Assay: Confirming production of 3HB

The chemical analysis of the produced bioplastic. The samples break break down to 3HB monomers after treatment with our PhaZ1 enzyme (BBa_K1149010). We synthesised P(3HB) using our improved Biobrick part (hybrid promoter phaCAB, BBa_K1149051). Our engineered bioplastic producing E. coli synthesised P(3HB) directly from waste. Imperial iGEM data


Production of P(3HB): Microscopy

Streaking the bacteria on Nile Red plates cannot be used to accurately decide the difference between P3HB production due to the effect differing thicknesses of cell layers will have on fluorescence intensity. We imaged the cells using the fluorescent microscope to qualitatively understand how much P3HB is produced per cell. As indicated by other authors, we saw that P3HB is found in localised granules within the bacteria. Empty vector containing cells show little fluorescence. In those that do, the staining is qualitatively different than in the phaCAB containing strains. Nile Red is also used as a lipid stain and this is indicated by its staining of the membranes of EV cells. In contrast, in phaCAB containing cells, staining is restricted to points within the cells.

Each fluorescent image was created by exciting the stain at 530nm for 100ms. Despite this standard treatment of samples the intensity of fluorescence produced by the cells containing the hybrid promoter is greater than from the constitutive ones. This could indicate a difference in the strength of the promoters which lead to phaCAB expression and therefore the amount of P3HB produced. The images also suggest that not every single E.coli is stained. This may be due to the conditions in which the cells were grown or may be dependent upon the stage in the lifecycle of the E.coli.


Fluorescent microscope images of E.coli stained with Nile Red. 1 -Empty vector, 2 - constitutive promoter phaCAB, 3 - hybrid promoter phaCAB. Images labelled a are fluorescent images excited at 530nm ovelaid on the bright field images shown in the b set of images. Images by Imperial College iGEM Team

Production of P(3HB): Nile Red Staining

O/N cultures of MG1655 transformed with either control (empty vector), native, constitutive or hybrid phaCAB constructs were spread onto LB-agar plates with 3% glucose and Nile red staining.

phaCAB P(3HB) synthesis constructs transformed into MG1655 Strains were grown on Nile red plates, which stain the PHB strongly and fluoresce in presence of PHB. On the left are MG1655 cells with an empty vector (no fluorescence; no plastic), at the bottom is the native promoter (i.e. low fluorescence, some plastic). At the top and right we have our constitutive and hybrid promoter (respectively), which both show high expression and thus fluoresce very clearly. Imperial iGEM data

Conclusion: The red staining indicates the production of P(3HB). More importantly our new Biobricks hybrid promoter phaCAB BBa_K1149051 and constitutive phaCAB BBa_K1149052 produce more P(3HB) than the native phaCAB operon To find more information about the reasons for improvement, the design and methods of changing the promoter on Imperial iGEM wiki: [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College/Waste_Degradation:_SRF Module 1: Waste to bioplastic]


References

References 1. H.Ohara. Change from Oil-based to Bio-based. Sen’i gakkaishi 66, 4.129-132 (2010) 2. Pohlmann, A. et al. Genome sequence of the bioplastic-producing “Knallgas” bacterium Ralstonia eutropha H16. Nature biotechnology 24, 1257–62 (2006).


J23104+B0034-NATIVE promoter (pwt)+RBS- phaCAB

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 7
    Illegal NheI site found at 30
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 979
    Illegal BglII site found at 1804
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 285
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 356
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 956
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1268
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1547
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 2199
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 2221
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI site found at 4065