Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041002"
(→BLAST Analysis) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1041002 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1041002 short</partinfo> | ||
− | Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 created this part using biobricks | + | Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 created this part using biobricks <partinfo>BBa_K1041000</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_K1041001</partinfo>. These biobricks both contain a Nde1 site after their promoter sequence, enabling a restriction digest to be performed. The RFP coding gene was excised from BBa_K1041000 and ligated in front of the AntG promoter of BBa_K1041001 to create a new biobrick. |
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Revision as of 13:48, 30 September 2013
AntG Promoter + RFP Coding Device
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 created this part using biobricks BBa_K1041000 and BBa_K1041001. These biobricks both contain a Nde1 site after their promoter sequence, enabling a restriction digest to be performed. The RFP coding gene was excised from BBa_K1041000 and ligated in front of the AntG promoter of BBa_K1041001 to create a new biobrick.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 683
Illegal AgeI site found at 795 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterisation
Characterisation of this biobrick involved sequencing, restriction digests and BLAST analysis.
Restriction Digest
Part Bba_K1041002 was digested with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to uncut DNA Fig 1.
Sequencing
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data recieved showed the DNA is good quality Fig 2,3,4..
BLAST Analysis
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence Fig 5,6.The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 96% matches.