Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041001:Experience"
(→Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013) |
(→Restriction Digest) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
====Restriction Digest==== | ====Restriction Digest==== | ||
Part Bba_K1041001 was cut with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to the uncut DNA. ''Fig 1'' | Part Bba_K1041001 was cut with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to the uncut DNA. ''Fig 1'' | ||
− | [[image:BIORAD 2013-09-18 16hr 02min.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 1:Lane 1 | + | [[image:BIORAD 2013-09-18 16hr 02min.JPG|thumb|left|Fig 1:Lane 1 contains uncut Bba_K1041001 and Lane 2 Bba_K1041001 cut with XbaI and NdeI.]] |
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 11:32, 20 September 2013
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 designed this part to contain the promoter sequence AntG, where the unique sigma factor AntA binds to activate transcription of the neomycin resistance gene. There is a Nde1 resticition site between the promoter and gene to allow either to be removed and exchanged for a different promoter or gene. This facilitated cloning of the biobrick Bba_K1041002
Characterisation of this biobrick involved sequencing, restriction digests and BLAST analysis.
Restriction Digest
Part Bba_K1041001 was cut with enzymes XbaI and NdeI and compared to the uncut DNA. Fig 1
Sequencing
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing and the data we received back Fig showed the DNA is of good quality.
BLAST Analysis
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence. The sequencing with both the forward and reverse primers had over 98% matches with the expected DNA sequence.
User Reviews
UNIQcb26ad32a36223a5-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQcb26ad32a36223a5-partinfo-00000001-QINU