Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041002"
(→Characterisation) |
(→Sequencing) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing. | The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing. | ||
− | [[image: | + | [[image:K1041002 1.JPG|thumb|left|K1041002 sequencing data part 1]] |
− | [[image: | + | [[image:K1041002 2.JPG|thumb|left|K1041002 sequencing data part 2 ]] |
− | [[image: | + | [[image:K1041002 3.JPG|thumb|left|K1041002 sequencing data part 3]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
===BLAST Analysis=== | ===BLAST Analysis=== | ||
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''fig.2'' | The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''fig.2'' |
Revision as of 19:52, 19 September 2013
AntG Promoter + RFP Coding Device
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 created this part using biobricks BBa_K1041000 and BBa_K1041001. These biobricks both contain a Nde1 site after their promoter sequence, enabling a restriction digest to be performed. The RFP coding gene was excised from BBa_K1041000 and ligated in front of the AntG promoter of BBa_K1041001 to create a new biobrick.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 683
Illegal AgeI site found at 795 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterisation
Characterisation of this biobrick involved sequencing, restriction digests and BLAST analysis.
Sequencing
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing.
BLAST Analysis
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence fig.2