Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K824008"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K824008 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K824008 short</partinfo> | ||
− | We digested the promoter responsive to Cadmium (BBa_K174015) with EcoRI and SpeI and digested the GFP plasmid (BBa_I13401) with XbaI and PstI. The promoter was Chloramphenicol resistant and the GFP was Ampicillin resistant. These digested fragments were mixed and ligated to the provided, linearized | + | We digested the promoter responsive to Cadmium (BBa_K174015) with EcoRI and SpeI and digested the GFP plasmid (BBa_I13401) with XbaI and PstI. The promoter was Chloramphenicol resistant and the GFP was Ampicillin resistant. These digested fragments were mixed and ligated to the provided, linearized pSB1C3 plasmid. The ligation mix was grown under Chloramphenicol selection. The resulting colonies were tested for responsive GFP production following the addition of Cadmium. |
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Latest revision as of 20:01, 3 October 2012
Cadmium Promoter with GFP Reporter
We digested the promoter responsive to Cadmium (BBa_K174015) with EcoRI and SpeI and digested the GFP plasmid (BBa_I13401) with XbaI and PstI. The promoter was Chloramphenicol resistant and the GFP was Ampicillin resistant. These digested fragments were mixed and ligated to the provided, linearized pSB1C3 plasmid. The ligation mix was grown under Chloramphenicol selection. The resulting colonies were tested for responsive GFP production following the addition of Cadmium.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 200
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 855