Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K902073:Design"
Kevinm.huie (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K902073 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K902073 short</partinfo> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
===Design Notes=== | ===Design Notes=== | ||
| − | |||
| + | This part was originally received from the Walters et al. 2011 paper. This part contained no illegal cut sites and the Biobrick prefix and suffix were added via polymerase chain reaction. | ||
===Source=== | ===Source=== | ||
| − | + | See <cite>Waters-2011</cite>. | |
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
| + | <biblio> | ||
| + | #Waters-2011 pmid=21908668 | ||
| + | </biblio> | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 3 October 2012
mntP promoter
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
This part was originally received from the Walters et al. 2011 paper. This part contained no illegal cut sites and the Biobrick prefix and suffix were added via polymerase chain reaction.
Source
See Waters-2011.
References
<biblio>
- Waters-2011 pmid=21908668
</biblio>