Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K592008:Experience"

 
(→‎User Reviews)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
Line 8: Line 7:
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K592008 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K592008 StartReviews</partinfo>
 +
 +
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 +
|-
 +
|width='10%'|
 +
<partinfo>BBa_K592008 AddReview number</partinfo>
 +
<I>[[User:agynna]]</I>
 +
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 +
 +
'''iGEM Team Uppsala University 2012'''
 +
 +
'''Promoter strength'''
 +
 +
[[Image:Lacirepression.png|300px|thumb|Promoter strenghts in MG1566 and DH5alpha, relative to J23101.]]
 +
 +
A promoter test was carried out to put synthetic and natural promoters on the same scale. Every promoter was assembled before B0032-SYFP2 (<partinfo>K864101</partinfo>) in the backbone <partinfo>K592200</partinfo>, whick is very similar to the pSB3x5 backbones. The test was performed in E coli expression strain MG1655 and cloning strain DH5alpha, by flow cytometry fluorescence measurements of single cells.
 +
 +
Triplicates of each strain and promoter were inoculated in 2 mL LB media with spectinomycin (50 µg/mL) and grown overnight shaking at 37° C. Samples were equilibrated in PBS solution at 1:160 dilution for one hour, and then measured by a BD Biosciences FACSaria III. 10^5 cells of each sample were individually measured and averaged, with dead and other non-flourescent cells excluded.
 +
 +
The variance in expression between MG1655 and DH5α may depend on the reference J23101. The maximum protein expression may be lower in DH5α, due to its lower fitness resulting in lower expression of SYFP2 in the J23101 construct. Alternatively, the clone with J23101 in DH5α may have been a weaker than average, resulting in higher RPU values compared to other DH5α.
 +
|};
 +
 +
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'

Revision as of 12:15, 2 October 2012

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K592008

User Reviews

UNIQb1e1c6bd1d52760d-partinfo-00000000-QINU

No review score entered. User:agynna

iGEM Team Uppsala University 2012

Promoter strength

Promoter strenghts in MG1566 and DH5alpha, relative to J23101.

A promoter test was carried out to put synthetic and natural promoters on the same scale. Every promoter was assembled before B0032-SYFP2 (BBa_K864101) in the backbone BBa_K592200, whick is very similar to the pSB3x5 backbones. The test was performed in E coli expression strain MG1655 and cloning strain DH5alpha, by flow cytometry fluorescence measurements of single cells.

Triplicates of each strain and promoter were inoculated in 2 mL LB media with spectinomycin (50 µg/mL) and grown overnight shaking at 37° C. Samples were equilibrated in PBS solution at 1:160 dilution for one hour, and then measured by a BD Biosciences FACSaria III. 10^5 cells of each sample were individually measured and averaged, with dead and other non-flourescent cells excluded.

The variance in expression between MG1655 and DH5α may depend on the reference J23101. The maximum protein expression may be lower in DH5α, due to its lower fitness resulting in lower expression of SYFP2 in the J23101 construct. Alternatively, the clone with J23101 in DH5α may have been a weaker than average, resulting in higher RPU values compared to other DH5α.

;


UNIQb1e1c6bd1d52760d-partinfo-00000004-QINU