Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K323214:Experience"
(→User Reviews) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter | This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://2012.igem.org/Team:Slovenia 2012 iGEM team Slovenia ] discovered that [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K323214 NicTAL ] part deposited in the Registry by the Slovenian iGEM2010 team was missing subdomain in DNA-binding domain, so our team added this missing part on N terminal sequence. Apart from adding N terminal sequence, we added HIS tag on N terminal end and NLS on terminal C end of NicTAL12 (Figure 1). | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Svn_12_NicTAL10vs12.PNG | 600 px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 1:'''Sequence alignment of NicTAL10 and NicTAL12, showing differences between constructs. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Results obtained by testing [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K782011#Characterization NicTAL12:KRAB] repressor proved that NicTAL12 binds to its binding sites better than NicTAL10. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Svn_12_NicTAL_graf.png]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Figure 2:''' Results of testing NicTAL12:KRAB repressor shows, that NicTAL12 binds to DNA better than NicTAL10. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K323214 StartReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K323214 StartReviews</partinfo> | ||
<!-- Template for a user review | <!-- Template for a user review |
Revision as of 17:30, 25 September 2012
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K323214
User Reviews
[http://2012.igem.org/Team:Slovenia 2012 iGEM team Slovenia ] discovered that NicTAL part deposited in the Registry by the Slovenian iGEM2010 team was missing subdomain in DNA-binding domain, so our team added this missing part on N terminal sequence. Apart from adding N terminal sequence, we added HIS tag on N terminal end and NLS on terminal C end of NicTAL12 (Figure 1).
Figure 1:Sequence alignment of NicTAL10 and NicTAL12, showing differences between constructs.
Results obtained by testing NicTAL12:KRAB repressor proved that NicTAL12 binds to its binding sites better than NicTAL10.
Figure 2: Results of testing NicTAL12:KRAB repressor shows, that NicTAL12 binds to DNA better than NicTAL10.
UNIQa09cdf1ca00ef19a-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQa09cdf1ca00ef19a-partinfo-00000001-QINU