Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K886000:Design"

 
(→‎Design Notes)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K886000 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K886000 short</partinfo>
Line 7: Line 6:
  
 
===Design Notes===
 
===Design Notes===
−
Based on the report made by the igem2010 UT-Tokyo team and some papers, the lox71 (BBa_I718017) from the registry was wrong, it had a cg instead a gc in its center sequence that is between the arms.  
+
Based on the report made by the igem2010 UT-Tokyo team and some papers, the lox71 (BBa_I718017) from the registry was wrong, it had a cg instead a gc in the 8pb spacer sequence that is between the 13pb arms.  
−
 
+
−
Apparently, this part was corrected by the iGEM11_WITS_CSIR_SA team (BBa_K537020), but the sequence from this group had the same error. The corrected part from iGEM11_Tokyo_Tech (BBa_K649205) was right but no DNA was available in the registry. So we decided to synthesized it and test it, using the proper sequence described by http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137435/, and we submitted the correct DNA to the Registry. 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
  
 +
Apparently, this part was corrected by the iGEM11_WITS_CSIR_SA team (BBa_K537020), but the sequence from this group had the same error. The corrected part from iGEM11_Tokyo_Tech (BBa_K649205) was right but no DNA was available in the registry. So we decided to synthesize it and test it, using the proper sequence described by http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137435/, and we submitted the correct DNA to the Registry.
  
 
===Source===
 
===Source===

Revision as of 22:00, 24 September 2012

Fixed lox71


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

Based on the report made by the igem2010 UT-Tokyo team and some papers, the lox71 (BBa_I718017) from the registry was wrong, it had a cg instead a gc in the 8pb spacer sequence that is between the 13pb arms.

Apparently, this part was corrected by the iGEM11_WITS_CSIR_SA team (BBa_K537020), but the sequence from this group had the same error. The corrected part from iGEM11_Tokyo_Tech (BBa_K649205) was right but no DNA was available in the registry. So we decided to synthesize it and test it, using the proper sequence described by http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137435/, and we submitted the correct DNA to the Registry.

Source

primers

References