Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J176013:Design"

(→‎References)
(→‎References)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
In order of date published:
 
In order of date published:
  
−
* Seipel K, Georgiev O, Schaffner W. ('''1992''') Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote ('enhancer') and proximal ('promoter') positions.
+
* (1992) Seipel K, Georgiev O, Schaffner W. Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote ('enhancer') and proximal ('promoter') positions. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):4961-8.
−
<br>Earliest reported test of a "modular" VP16 "core" activator, ; behavior is compared to activation domains from other transcription factors
+
<br>Earliest reported test of a "modular" VP16 "core" activator, DALDDFDLDML; activity was compared to activation domains from other transcription factors
 
*
 
*

Revision as of 01:59, 22 November 2011

VP64


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

TBA


Source

TBA

References

In order of date published:

  • (1992) Seipel K, Georgiev O, Schaffner W. Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote ('enhancer') and proximal ('promoter') positions. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):4961-8.


Earliest reported test of a "modular" VP16 "core" activator, DALDDFDLDML; activity was compared to activation domains from other transcription factors