Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K606035:Experience"

(Microscopy Characterization)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
===User Reviews===
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K606035 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray'
 
|-
 
|width='10%'|
 
<partinfo>BBa_K606035 AddReview number</partinfo>
 
<I>Username</I>
 
|width='60%' valign='top'|
 
Enter the review inofrmation here.
 
|};
 
<!-- End of the user review template -->
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K606035 EndReviews</partinfo>
 

Latest revision as of 12:03, 24 October 2011

Characterization

This construct was transformed into BL21 strains expressing the T7 polymerase under IPTG induction.

Fluorescence kinetics

The measurements have been carried out on a spectrophotometer, at 37°C under transient shaking. The experiment lasted 4h, we tested several colonies and several IPTG concentrations. The OD 600nm and the fluorescence of the GFP (exc: 470nm / meas:515 nm) was measured every 5 min, and the ratio of the two was calculated.

All values were normalized by substracting the fluorescence/OD value of the well with 0 mM IPTG at time 0. The values given are in arbitrary units.

Fig1: Growth curves for BL21 strain carrying the part

After 2 hrs of induction, we see a clear increase of the fluorescence proportional to the IPTG concentration (that is to say with the quantity of T7 polymerase induced in the cell). After 4 hrs, the expression of GFP under the pT7 is still not saturated

Fig2: Comparison of the Fluo/OD ratio for transcription

Here, we plot the ratio of induction of the T7 polymerase dependant construct for the different concentrations of IPTG at a given time (4 hrs), taking the well with 0 IPTG at time 0 as the reference.