Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K633014"

 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K633014 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K633014 short</partinfo>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
The composite part includes a functional expression device for autotransporter membrane protein estA, with a linker united to a cellulase, attached to a membrane signaling peptide. This was our final construct missing a terminator. '''By the use of the restriction enzymes, NheI and SacI, more enzymes can be displayed outside the outer membrane of ''E. coli.'''''
  
The composite part includes a functional expression vector for autotransporter membrane protein estA, with a linker united to a cellulase, attached to a membrane signaling peptide. This was our final construct missing a terminator
 
  
 
The construct efectiveness was tested by an enzymatic assay, The results can be seen here: http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tec-Monterrey/projectresults
 
The construct efectiveness was tested by an enzymatic assay, The results can be seen here: http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tec-Monterrey/projectresults
Line 10: Line 12:
  
  
 +
In order to find suitable arabinose concentrations to induce expression of the construct, the protein coding sequences were substituted by a GFP reporter, BBa_e0040. A double terminator, BBa_e0014, was added as well. The expression vehicle was ''Escherichia coli'', BW27783 strain, due to its inability to metabolize arabinose. Fluorescence was measured in transformed ''E. coli'' cultures induced with different concentrations of L-arabinose (1%), following the protocol used by Cambridge (2009) and Tec-Monterrey (2010).
  
Other teams (Slovenia 2010, Cambridge 2009) had characterized these systems.
+
<center>[[Image:Induction_gfp.jpg‎]]</center>
Given the complexity of our system, we neened to guarantee an effective expression of our constructs with an optimal concentration for induction by L-arabinose.
+
 +
The chart shows that at low concentrations of arabinose, poor induction levels are obtained since fluorescence changes very little over time. A noticeable increase of fluorescence is viewed from a concentration of 100 µM onwards. Similar results were found in BBa_I0500 characterization by Cambridge (2011) and Groningen (2011), proving further the effectiveness of using this concentration of arabinose as a minimum to induce expression of the construct.
 +
<br><br>
 +
----
 +
<br>
  
'''The protocol was taken from Team Cambridge 2009 and Tec-Monterrey 2010.'''
 
  
Pick three different colonies that contain the desired part to be characterized and place each of them in a different 50 mL tube with 5 mL LB medium.
+
Whole-Cell CelD+estA Activity
 +
<br>
  
Add 1 μL of the corresponding antibiotic per each mL of LB medium.
+
<center>[[Image:ThelWhole.png‎]]
 +
<br>
 +
Figure 2. Whole-Cell Cellulase Activity.
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
The glucose concentration in celD + estA strain was of 332.04 µM and in the Negative Control (C-) was of 275.85 µM that is a difference in the glucose concentration of 57 µM. The result of the t- test was the rejection of the null hypothesis, suggesting that the difference between them is significant.  
  
Pick one colony that does not contain the plasmid with the part that will be characterized (control) and place it in a 50 mL tube with 5 mL LB medium.
+
<br>
 
+
<br>
Incubate all the 4 tubes for 16 hours on a shaker at 37°C and 350 rpm.
+
Cell-Lysate CelD+estA Activity
 
+
<br>
Check the OD600 of the cultures and dilute with fresh LB medium until an OD600 of 0.1 is reached. Make sure that you have at least 7 mL of each culture.
+
<center>[[Image:Thelsolinsol.png‎]]
 +
Figure 3.Cellulase Activity of Cell lysates.
 +
</center>
 +
<br>
 +
In the cell-lysate cellulase activity assay (Figure 3) The glucose concentration in the soluble fraction of celD-estA was of 358 µM and in the Negative Control (C-) was of 323 µM.In the insoluble fraction, the glucose contentration of the celD-estA was 374 µM and in the Negative Control (C-) was of 264 µM. The difference in soluble and insoluble fractions with its negative control was 35 µM while the difference in the insoluble fraction was 110 µM. The result of the t-test was the rejection of the null hyphothesis, suggesting that the difference between them is also significant.  
  
Add 1 μL of the corresponding antibiotic per each mL of LB medium.
+
<br>
 
+
----
Incubate all the 4 tubes on a shaker at 37°C and 350 rpm until an OD600 of 0.6 is reached.
+
'''Note: There is an ilegal NheI restrition site in the promoter region, part BBa_K206000'''.
 
+
<br>
Fill each well with 198 μl of inoculum and 2 μl of L-Arabinose at different concentrations. Make 3 repetitions of each colony with the different concentrations of L-Arabinose.
+
----
 
+
The microplate is then read by the microplate reader by using the following protocol:
+
Set temperature to 37°C
+
 
+
Kinetic reading lasting 4 hours with measurements every 5 minutes.
+
 
+
Absorbance (600 nm filter) and Fluorescence (Excitation: 485 nm, Emission: 528 nm).
+
 
+
Shaking in intensity 2 for 5 seconds before every reading.
+
 
+
Export the results of the well data to an Excel sheet for further interpretation.
+
 
+
The vehicle of expression was BW2773 strain, recommended for its inability to metabolize arabinose.
+
 
+
GRAFICAAAAAA:O!!!!!
+
  
  

Latest revision as of 01:25, 20 October 2011

AraC+Pbad promoter+RBS+signal peptide phoA+Cellulase+Linker+estA membrane protein

The composite part includes a functional expression device for autotransporter membrane protein estA, with a linker united to a cellulase, attached to a membrane signaling peptide. This was our final construct missing a terminator. By the use of the restriction enzymes, NheI and SacI, more enzymes can be displayed outside the outer membrane of E. coli.


The construct efectiveness was tested by an enzymatic assay, The results can be seen here: http://2011.igem.org/Team:Tec-Monterrey/projectresults


In order to find suitable arabinose concentrations to induce expression of the construct, the protein coding sequences were substituted by a GFP reporter, BBa_e0040. A double terminator, BBa_e0014, was added as well. The expression vehicle was Escherichia coli, BW27783 strain, due to its inability to metabolize arabinose. Fluorescence was measured in transformed E. coli cultures induced with different concentrations of L-arabinose (1%), following the protocol used by Cambridge (2009) and Tec-Monterrey (2010).

Induction gfp.jpg

The chart shows that at low concentrations of arabinose, poor induction levels are obtained since fluorescence changes very little over time. A noticeable increase of fluorescence is viewed from a concentration of 100 µM onwards. Similar results were found in BBa_I0500 characterization by Cambridge (2011) and Groningen (2011), proving further the effectiveness of using this concentration of arabinose as a minimum to induce expression of the construct.




Whole-Cell CelD+estA Activity

ThelWhole.png


Figure 2. Whole-Cell Cellulase Activity.


The glucose concentration in celD + estA strain was of 332.04 µM and in the Negative Control (C-) was of 275.85 µM that is a difference in the glucose concentration of 57 µM. The result of the t- test was the rejection of the null hypothesis, suggesting that the difference between them is significant.



Cell-Lysate CelD+estA Activity

Thelsolinsol.png

Figure 3.Cellulase Activity of Cell lysates.


In the cell-lysate cellulase activity assay (Figure 3) The glucose concentration in the soluble fraction of celD-estA was of 358 µM and in the Negative Control (C-) was of 323 µM.In the insoluble fraction, the glucose contentration of the celD-estA was 374 µM and in the Negative Control (C-) was of 264 µM. The difference in soluble and insoluble fractions with its negative control was 35 µM while the difference in the insoluble fraction was 110 µM. The result of the t-test was the rejection of the null hyphothesis, suggesting that the difference between them is also significant.



Note: There is an ilegal NheI restrition site in the promoter region, part BBa_K206000.



Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 1247
    Illegal NheI site found at 3168
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1187
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1981
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1845
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 3398
    Illegal AgeI site found at 979
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1488
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1904
    Illegal AgeI site found at 2733
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI site found at 961