Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K511000"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Cotransfection of a construct containing a yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) driven by the Hef1a-LacO promoter with a construct containing a LacI-KRAB transcriptional repressor driven by the TRE-Tight promoter proves that it is possible to repress Hef1a-LacO expression with the LacI-KRAB LacI variant, which includes a Kruppel-associated box motif previously shown to silence chromatin and thereby inhibit transcription. | Cotransfection of a construct containing a yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) driven by the Hef1a-LacO promoter with a construct containing a LacI-KRAB transcriptional repressor driven by the TRE-Tight promoter proves that it is possible to repress Hef1a-LacO expression with the LacI-KRAB LacI variant, which includes a Kruppel-associated box motif previously shown to silence chromatin and thereby inhibit transcription. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/thumb/0/0c/Doxiptg2inputandgate.jpg/800px-Doxiptg2inputandgate.jpg' style="width:60%"> | ||
To see further information about this part, consult the Results found on the iGEM 2011 wiki. | To see further information about this part, consult the Results found on the iGEM 2011 wiki. |
Revision as of 03:52, 29 September 2011
Hef1a-LacOid Promoter MammoBlock
This part encodes a promoter with low-level, constitutive activity that can be repressed by variants of the LacI transcriptional repressor.
Cotransfection of a construct containing a yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) driven by the Hef1a-LacO promoter with a construct containing a LacI-KRAB transcriptional repressor driven by the TRE-Tight promoter proves that it is possible to repress Hef1a-LacO expression with the LacI-KRAB LacI variant, which includes a Kruppel-associated box motif previously shown to silence chromatin and thereby inhibit transcription.
<img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2011/thumb/0/0c/Doxiptg2inputandgate.jpg/800px-Doxiptg2inputandgate.jpg' style="width:60%">
To see further information about this part, consult the Results found on the iGEM 2011 wiki.
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal PstI site found at 416
Illegal PstI site found at 921 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 292
Illegal PstI site found at 416
Illegal PstI site found at 921 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 670
Illegal BamHI site found at 255
Illegal XhoI site found at 1069 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal PstI site found at 416
Illegal PstI site found at 921 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal PstI site found at 416
Illegal PstI site found at 921
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 804
Illegal AgeI site found at 80 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]