Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K554009:Experience"

 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
 
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter
 
how you used this part and how it worked out.
 
how you used this part and how it worked out.
 +
==Device 3 testing, Protein Secretion System==
 +
 +
The assembled devices related to secretion system (Hemolysin secretion system under control of SoxS – SoxS-HlyB-HlyD-TolC) was tested under laboratory conditions using GFP as reporter.
 +
 +
[[Image:UNICAMP_EMSE_secretion_device_schema2.jpg|center|730px]]
 +
<div align=center> '''Figure 1: Testing [http://2011.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-EMSE_Brazil/Project#Device_3:_Secretion_system Device 3] through replacement of IL-10 to GFP. '''</div>
 +
 +
===Methods===
 +
 +
To access GFP secretion, competent E. coli DH5α strain cells were transformed simultaneously with a pSB1C3 vector (Chloramphenicol resistant) carrying both the sensor (Strong_Constitutive_promoter + RBS + SoxR + Terminator) and the effector (SoxS_promoter + RBS + GFP + HlyA + Terminator), and pSB1AK3 (Ampicillin resistant) carrying the secretion system (SoxS_promoter + RBS + HlyB + HlyD + TolC + Terminator). As a non-secretion control, E. coli harboring only the pSB1C3 vector with both sensor and effector systems was used.
 +
 +
Oxidative stress was induced by adding increasing concentrations of Paraquat (Methyl viologen dichloride hydrate - Sigma), an oxidative stress inducer in bacteria. The secretion was tested in cultures harboring A) and B) (Figure ) using 0 μM and 40 μM of Paraquat as described [http://2011.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-EMSE_Brazil/Results#Methods above]. After 3 hours samples were collected, centrifuged (4000 rpm / 10 min; to avoid cell lysis) and the supernatant was collected and centrifuged again (13000 rpm / 10 min; to remove remaining cells). The supernatant fluorescence was measured in fluorometer (SLM – Aminco; 4 nm bandpass and 10 mm) with excitation in 500 nm and emission spectra from 508-550 nm. The GFP fluorescence was also detected in cells by fluorescence microscopy (Olympus).
 +
 +
===Results===
 +
Microscopy data revealed GFP expression in the Paraquat induced cultures (Figure 2) but not in the non-induced one (Figure 3).
 +
 +
[[Image:picind.png|center|600px]]
 +
<div align=center>'''Figure 2: GFP fluorescence assessed by microscopy in Paraquat induced cells. A) Fluorescence microscopy 40X Exp.: 0.478 ms; B) Light microscopy 40X; C) Fluorescence microscopy 100X Exp.: 0.478 ms; D) Light microscopy 100X.'''</div>
 +
 +
 +
[[Image:picnotind.png|center|600px]]
 +
<div align=center>'''Figure 3: GFP fluorescence assessed by microscopy in non-induced cells. A) Fluorescence microscopy 40X Exp.: 0.478 ms; B) Light microscopy 40X; C) Fluorescence microscopy 100X Exp.: 0.478 ms; D) Light microscopy 100X.'''</div>
 +
 +
 +
GFP secretion was confirmed by fluorescence emission and estimated to be approximately 6% of total protein, according to fluorescence levels. Significant levels of GFP fluorescence were found only in the supernatant of Paraquat induced cultures containing both the sensor/effector and the secretion systems but not in the non-induced cultures and in the cultures containing only the sensor/effector system (Figure 4).
 +
 +
 +
[[Image:Unicamp-emse-graph-secr.png|center|600px]]
 +
<div align=center>'''Figure 4:  Supernatant fluorescence emission from 508 to 540 nm, excitation in 500 nm. Black squares (40 μM A):  sensor/effector with secretion system; Green triangles (40 μM B): sensor/effector without secretion system; Red circles (0 μM): sensor/effector with secretion system, non-induced.'''</div>
  
−
===Applications of BBa_K554009===
 
  
−
===User Reviews===
 
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K554009 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K554009 StartReviews</partinfo>
 
<!-- Template for a user review
 
<!-- Template for a user review

Revision as of 03:16, 29 September 2011

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Device 3 testing, Protein Secretion System

The assembled devices related to secretion system (Hemolysin secretion system under control of SoxS – SoxS-HlyB-HlyD-TolC) was tested under laboratory conditions using GFP as reporter.

UNICAMP EMSE secretion device schema2.jpg
Figure 1: Testing [http://2011.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-EMSE_Brazil/Project#Device_3:_Secretion_system Device 3] through replacement of IL-10 to GFP.

Methods

To access GFP secretion, competent E. coli DH5α strain cells were transformed simultaneously with a pSB1C3 vector (Chloramphenicol resistant) carrying both the sensor (Strong_Constitutive_promoter + RBS + SoxR + Terminator) and the effector (SoxS_promoter + RBS + GFP + HlyA + Terminator), and pSB1AK3 (Ampicillin resistant) carrying the secretion system (SoxS_promoter + RBS + HlyB + HlyD + TolC + Terminator). As a non-secretion control, E. coli harboring only the pSB1C3 vector with both sensor and effector systems was used.

Oxidative stress was induced by adding increasing concentrations of Paraquat (Methyl viologen dichloride hydrate - Sigma), an oxidative stress inducer in bacteria. The secretion was tested in cultures harboring A) and B) (Figure ) using 0 μM and 40 μM of Paraquat as described [http://2011.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-EMSE_Brazil/Results#Methods above]. After 3 hours samples were collected, centrifuged (4000 rpm / 10 min; to avoid cell lysis) and the supernatant was collected and centrifuged again (13000 rpm / 10 min; to remove remaining cells). The supernatant fluorescence was measured in fluorometer (SLM – Aminco; 4 nm bandpass and 10 mm) with excitation in 500 nm and emission spectra from 508-550 nm. The GFP fluorescence was also detected in cells by fluorescence microscopy (Olympus).

Results

Microscopy data revealed GFP expression in the Paraquat induced cultures (Figure 2) but not in the non-induced one (Figure 3).

Picind.png
Figure 2: GFP fluorescence assessed by microscopy in Paraquat induced cells. A) Fluorescence microscopy 40X Exp.: 0.478 ms; B) Light microscopy 40X; C) Fluorescence microscopy 100X Exp.: 0.478 ms; D) Light microscopy 100X.


Picnotind.png
Figure 3: GFP fluorescence assessed by microscopy in non-induced cells. A) Fluorescence microscopy 40X Exp.: 0.478 ms; B) Light microscopy 40X; C) Fluorescence microscopy 100X Exp.: 0.478 ms; D) Light microscopy 100X.


GFP secretion was confirmed by fluorescence emission and estimated to be approximately 6% of total protein, according to fluorescence levels. Significant levels of GFP fluorescence were found only in the supernatant of Paraquat induced cultures containing both the sensor/effector and the secretion systems but not in the non-induced cultures and in the cultures containing only the sensor/effector system (Figure 4).


Unicamp-emse-graph-secr.png
Figure 4: Supernatant fluorescence emission from 508 to 540 nm, excitation in 500 nm. Black squares (40 μM A): sensor/effector with secretion system; Green triangles (40 μM B): sensor/effector without secretion system; Red circles (0 μM): sensor/effector with secretion system, non-induced.


UNIQ9667da7a41f1b117-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ9667da7a41f1b117-partinfo-00000001-QINU