Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K538004:Experience"
B.Stringer (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
+ | [[Image:Freeze_thaw_graph.png|right|frame|'''Figure 1.''' Percentage of surviving cells after 1, 2 and 3 freeze/thaw cycles for ''E. coli'' that contains a ''CspC'' generator (blue) or an empty control vector (black).]] | ||
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter | This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.<BR>Please enter | ||
how you used this part and how it worked out. | how you used this part and how it worked out. | ||
===Applications of BBa_K538004=== | ===Applications of BBa_K538004=== | ||
+ | This brick's effect on ''E. coli'' 's cold resistance was characterised by its developers, team [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Amsterdam Amsterdam 2011]. Expressing it via [[Part:BBa_K538204|BBa_K538204]], they looked into '''1)''' whether or not expression of ''CspC'' influences growth rate at suboptimal temperatures, and '''2)''' if ''E. coli'' comprising this brick experiences enhanced freeze/thaw cycle survival. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''CspC'' is a cold-induced chaperone, so it's conceivably beneficial to growth rate at low temperatures. However, there are no indications of this in literature, so there were no strong ''a priori'' expectations about this brick's influence on growth rate. It ''has'' been reported ''CspC'' strongly increases ''E. coli'' 's ability to survive freeze/thaw cycles.[http://www.springerlink.com/index/QR2Q5722J0T78653.pdf] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Expression of this brick wasn't found to have a significant effect on ''E. coli'' 's growthrate at suboptimal temperatures, which is as we expected, but not what we'd hoped for. We '''did''', however, manage to reproduce the cold resistant phenotype described by Uh ''et al.'' in a freeze/thaw cycle experiment whose results are displayed in figure 1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | # '''Uh ''et al.''''' Rescue of a Cold-Sensitive Mutant at Low Temperatures by Cold Shock Proteins from ''Polaribacter irgensii'' KOPRI 22228 ''J. Microbiol. 48, 798-802'' (2010) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===User Reviews=== | ===User Reviews=== | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K538004 StartReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K538004 StartReviews</partinfo> | ||
+ | {|width='55%' style='border:1px solid gray' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width='25%'| | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K538204 AddReview 5</partinfo> | ||
+ | <I>[http://2011.igem.org/Team:Amsterdam Amsterdam 2011]</I> | ||
+ | |width='80%' valign='top'| | ||
+ | It's our own brick, but we happily confirm it works as intended! | ||
+ | |}; | ||
+ | |||
<!-- Template for a user review | <!-- Template for a user review | ||
{|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray' | {|width='80%' style='border:1px solid gray' | ||
Line 18: | Line 37: | ||
|}; | |}; | ||
<!-- End of the user review template --> | <!-- End of the user review template --> | ||
+ | |||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K538004 EndReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K538004 EndReviews</partinfo> |
Latest revision as of 19:15, 21 September 2011
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K538004
This brick's effect on E. coli 's cold resistance was characterised by its developers, team [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Amsterdam Amsterdam 2011]. Expressing it via BBa_K538204, they looked into 1) whether or not expression of CspC influences growth rate at suboptimal temperatures, and 2) if E. coli comprising this brick experiences enhanced freeze/thaw cycle survival.
CspC is a cold-induced chaperone, so it's conceivably beneficial to growth rate at low temperatures. However, there are no indications of this in literature, so there were no strong a priori expectations about this brick's influence on growth rate. It has been reported CspC strongly increases E. coli 's ability to survive freeze/thaw cycles.[http://www.springerlink.com/index/QR2Q5722J0T78653.pdf]
Expression of this brick wasn't found to have a significant effect on E. coli 's growthrate at suboptimal temperatures, which is as we expected, but not what we'd hoped for. We did, however, manage to reproduce the cold resistant phenotype described by Uh et al. in a freeze/thaw cycle experiment whose results are displayed in figure 1.
References
- Uh et al. Rescue of a Cold-Sensitive Mutant at Low Temperatures by Cold Shock Proteins from Polaribacter irgensii KOPRI 22228 J. Microbiol. 48, 798-802 (2010)
User Reviews
UNIQ25cedb02d5b796e2-partinfo-00000000-QINU
•••••
[http://2011.igem.org/Team:Amsterdam Amsterdam 2011] |
It's our own brick, but we happily confirm it works as intended! |
UNIQ25cedb02d5b796e2-partinfo-00000002-QINU